I’ve been reading Sally Denton’s
book about the Mormons in which she focuses on a deliberate massacre of a group
of about 140 people traversing the Utah territory in 1857, emigrating from
Arkansas to California. Denton begins her tale by detailing the history of the
Mormon Church in the decades leading up to the massacre. It makes a very
interesting story, containing elements similar to those of other revivalist
religions in the United States and elsewhere. The origins of Mormonism have points
in common with Islam: a man is visited with “visions” that come from God/Allah
and begins to preach a new dispensation, collecting immediate acolytes and in
short order, a multitude of followers. Both of these religions borrow heavily
from the Old and New Testaments, weaving their stories into a new cloth and
elevating their prophet to a quasi-mystical relationship to God: the leader
from whom not only doctrine, but also the practical details of life begin to
flow.
In the 1820s Joseph Smith, the
original prophet, penned and published his creed in what soon became the
best-selling Book of Mormon, in itself converting thousands across the
developing USA and in England. As people flocked to his new communion of the “Saints,”
Smith enrolled them in the development of a real American communism, in which
all strove to work and to succeed and to share the benefits with their
coreligionists. The community antagonized nearby settlers, however, perhaps by
the intensity of their attempts to proselytize or simply because of their
steadily enriched holdings. Several times the new Church was forced to move to
newer, less developed regions because of local conflict. Inevitably something
of a siege mentality developed among the brethren. Revelation of two of the most
difficult to accept aspects of their communal life began to spread a generalized sense of
revulsion in the country against the group.
The first was the practice of
polygamy which though officially denied was carried out secretly by elders of the
church, not least by Joseph Smith himself. Young girls, married, or engaged
women were approached and seduced into joining the “spiritually” select and
richly appointed households of these men. Another offensive practice called “blood
atonement” was inflicted upon those who had been identified as having sinned, by
a select military group called the Danites, named after the book of Daniel. By
this doctrine the offender, guilty of adultery or of apostasy would be able to
enter the Kingdom of the Saints only by the shedding of their own blood. The
Danites were empowered to “assist” the recalcitrant to their eternal reward
through a ritual of beheading. This practice was enforced throughout the early
and mid-19th centuries. Individuals attempting to extricate themselves
from the sect could do so only by running away and even then could not be
certain of safety as fervent Danites would pursue them.
Within the church dissention
began to divide Smith’s followers between those who believed he had usurped an
unconscionable degree of power and those who continued to see him as the hand
and the voice of God on earth. In 1844 two apostates, former members of the
inner circle of 50 Elders, started a newspaper dedicated to exposing Smith’s
appropriation of communal riches and his polygamy. At this period the church
was settled in a relatively small hamlet in Illinois. Smith reacted to the
public charges by having the newspaper attacked and set on fire. Local law
enforcers were able to arrest him within a few days. Sequestered in the local
jail, Smith sent orders to his Danite troops to converge on the area to free
him. Before they could assemble, however, a vigilante mob surrounded the jail and
promptly murdered the Mormon prophet.
This unexpected death of their
leader threw the church into confusion as no clear hierarchy obviated his successor.
Some favoured Smith’s son, though still a minor, but within the ranks of elders
others nursed ambitions of their own. Of these, Brigham Young over the next two
or three years was able to establish his preeminence. Once acknowledged as the
new supreme head of the church, Young took on not just administrative roles,
but styled himself as well a seer, a prophet, and the source of the commands of
God over the faithful. The usual abuses that accompany this kind of power were
not long being evidenced. Young’s stable of young and beautiful wives
flourished, as did his considerable personal wealth. The locus of the faithful
moved once again – from Illinois where “the blood of the prophet” had been
shed, to the Utah territory by the Great Salt Lake and along a navigable trail
that became a major avenue for settlers moving from eastern states to
California.
Here the brethren began again,
working in difficult circumstances to transform hostile soil into a productive
landscape for their ever-growing community. Groups traversing the area depended
upon trade with these new locals: some of the herds that came with them in
exchange for vegetables and grains. It was an economy that profited all. Problems
were developing within the ranks of the faithful, however: some families that
had enthusiastically joined with Joseph Smith in their early flush of religious
fervour, grew unhappy with the dictatorial leadership imposed upon them by a
clearly benefiting group of elders. Under threat, Young fell back upon that
time-honoured method of rekindling communal ardour: identify a common enemy. He
manipulated relations with the regional natives, the Utes, a basically quite
peaceful tribe, and with the agents of the Federal government, to inspire a
sense that “the Saints,” God’s people, chosen to lead humanity into the promised
millennium, could be annihilated.
It was this engendered
communal paranoia and commands from the top of the hierarchy to maintain it
that led directly to the massacre of over 140 men, women, and children at a
meadow on the Utah trail as they were travelling from Arkansas to California in
September, 1857.
As this post is now becoming
rather lengthy, and the blogger is aware of the time restraints as well as
possibly the patience of her readers, she will now allocate the remainder of
the story to her next post. Those of you uninterested in such a history may
skip the next installment. Those of you who want more, please keep your breathe
bated!
No comments:
Post a Comment